Search for: All records

Not AvailableStandard Discrete Choice Models (DCMs) assume that unobserved effects that influence decision-making are independently and identically distributed among individuals. When unobserved effects are spatially correlated, the independence assumption does not hold, leading to biased standard errors and potentially biased parameter estimates. This paper proposes an interpretable Hierarchical Nearest Neighbor Gaussian Process (HNNGP) model to account for spatially correlated unobservables in discrete choice analysis. Gaussian Processes (GPs) are often regarded as lacking interpretability due to their non-parametric nature. However, we demonstrate how to incorporate GPs directly into the latent utility specification to flexibly model spatially correlated unobserved effects without sacrificing structural economic interpretation. To empirically test our proposed HNNGP models, we analyze binary and multinomial mode choices for commuting to work in New York City. For the multinomial case, we formulate and estimate HNNGPs with and without independence from irrelevant alternatives (IIA). Building on the interpretability of our modeling strategy, we provide both point estimates and credible intervals for the value of travel time savings in NYC. Finally, we compare the results from all proposed specifications with those derived from a standard logit model and a probit model with spatially autocorrelated errors (SAE) to showcase how accounting for different sources of spatial correlation in discrete choice can significantly impact inference. We also show that the HNNGP models attain better out-of-sample prediction performance when compared to the logit and probit SAE models, especially in the multinomial case. 

Random parameter logit models address unobserved preference heterogeneity in discrete choice analysis. The latent class logit model assumes a discrete heterogeneity distribution, by combining a conditional logit model of economic choices with a multinomial logit (MNL) for stochastic assignment to classes. Whereas point estimation of latent class logit models is widely applied in practice, stochastic assignment of individuals to classes needs further analysis. In this paper we analyze the statistical behavior of six competing class assignment strategies, namely: maximum prior MNL probabilities, class drawn from prior MNL probabilities, maximum posterior assignment, drawn posterior assignment, conditional individual-specific estimates, and conditional individual estimates combined with the Krinsky–Robb method to account for uncertainty. Using both a Monte Carlo study and two empirical case studies, we show that assigning individuals to classes based on maximum MNL probabilities behaves better than randomly drawn classes in market share predictions. However, randomly drawn classes have higher accuracy in predicted class shares. Finally, class assignment based on individual-level conditional estimates that account for the sampling distribution of the assignment parameters shows superior behavior for a larger number of choice occasions per individual. 

Abstract BackgroundUsing choice microdata (N=2723) across the USA, this paper analyzes elicited acceptance of hypothetical COVID-19 vaccines. MethodsThe hypothetical vaccines in a choice experiment were described in terms of effectiveness, days for antibodies to develop, duration of protection, risk of both mild and severe side effects, which health agency mainly supports the vaccine, country of origin, and when the vaccine was developed. Out-of-pocket cost was also considered as characteristic of the vaccines to derive welfare measures. ResultsAll vaccine attributes had expected signs with significant estimates. Vaccines developed in the USA and the UK were preferred to a hypothetical German vaccine, whereas a Chinese origin was very negatively perceived. Since the choice scenarios also gave the option to opt out from taking the vaccine, odds ratios were derived to characterize the segments that are more and less likely to accept vaccination. More likely to opt out were found to be those who stated to be against vaccination in general, African Americans, individuals without health insurance, and older people. Males, democrats, those who took the flu vaccine appear as more willing to accept vaccination. ConclusionsEstimates of the fitted choice models in this study are informative for current and future immunization programs. 

Summary Maximum simulated likelihood estimation of mixed multinomial logit models requires evaluation of a multidimensional integral. Quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC) methods such as Halton sequences and modified Latin hypercube sampling are workhorse methods for integral approximation. Earlier studies explored the potential of sparse grid quadrature (SGQ), but SGQ suffers from negative weights. As an alternative to QMC and SGQ, we looked into the recently developed designed quadrature (DQ) method. DQ requires fewer nodes to get the same level of accuracy as QMC and SGQ, is as easy to implement, ensures positivity of weights, and can be created on any general polynomial space. We benchmarked DQ against QMC in a Monte Carlo and an empirical study. DQ outperformed QMC in all considered scenarios, is practice ready, and has potential to become the workhorse method for integral approximation.